Kozlowski For Congress

Home

FAQ

Positions

Press Releases

A Challenge to Republican Candidates
September 15
September 14
September 12
September 11
September 10
September 9
September 8
September 7
September 5
September 4
September 3
September 2
September 1
August 31
August 29
August 28
August 27
August 26

Send us your comments

 

A Challenge to the Republican Candidates

September 1 What is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment?

John Kozlowski

The 2nd Amendment ensures that ultimate power remains with the people and not with the state. All infringements of the right to keep and bear arms are attempts to move power from the people to the state.

We must remember our history. Our nation’s birth certificate, The Declaration of Independence, when referring to people and a tyrannical government, states that "it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government." This great document would have ended up on the scrap heap of history if our founders had not backed it up with the barrel of a gun. The citizens of this new nation fought for freedom and won.

From experience, it was fundamental to the framers of the Constitution that a government that did not fear its citizens was a government again bound for tyranny. Therefore, they ensured that all power rested with "We the People" and not with the government. They knew that power resided with those who held the strongest weapons. Those weapons must never be taken from the people.

We have an innate, God given right, to protect ourselves. When something is flung at your face, do you not react by defending yourself? If someone wants to hurt you or enslave you, your right to protect yourself still exists. That right to protect yourself, fundamentally from a tyrannical government, is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

We see repeatedly in history how disarming the citizen led to the deaths of millions. In this century alone, in Cambodia, China, Guatemala, Turkey, Uganda, the USSR, and Nazi Germany over fifty-five million people died at the hands of their own governments after the government disarmed its people. Would disarming US Citizens result in anything different?

To deny the right to bear arms is to say that the efforts of those that fought and died to form this nation were in vain. I will vote to eliminate all gun regulation. The price to do otherwise is too great.

Patrick Henry.jpg (15187 bytes) "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"

(Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775)

Tom Bush
?
Jim Cohen

?

Mike Jackson

?

Scott Keadle

?

Steve Wood

?

 

Kozlowski For Congress 1998
Web Site Archive

PortraitFooter.jpg (2368 bytes)